2d4e1e144c
Since r10-6527 fold_for_warn calls maybe_constant_value, which means it can fold more than it previously could. In this testcase it means that cp_build_binary_op/RSHIFT_EXPR set short_shift because now we were able to fold op1 to an INTEGER_CST. But then when actually performing the shortening we crashed because cp_fold_rvalue wasn't able to fold as much as f_f_w and so tree_int_cst_sgn crashed on a NOP_EXPR. Therefore the calls should probably match. PR c++/94955 * typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Use fold_for_warn instead of cp_fold_rvalue. * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-shift2.C: New test.
13 lines
170 B
C
13 lines
170 B
C
// PR c++/94955
|
|
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
|
|
|
|
struct S {
|
|
static constexpr char foo() { return 10; }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
short int
|
|
fn (short int e)
|
|
{
|
|
return e >> S::foo();
|
|
}
|