While looking at 92583/92654 it occurred to me that typename types needed the same fix. So extract_locals_r also needs to see the TYPE_CONTEXT of a TYPENAME_TYPE. But it must not look through a typedef. Most tree walking in the front end wants to walk through the syntactic form of a type of expression, and doesn't care about the type referred to by a typedef. But min_vis_r does care. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2020-05-11 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> PR c++/92583 PR c++/92654 * tree.c (cp_walk_subtrees): Stop at typedefs. Handle TYPENAME_TYPE here. * pt.c (find_parameter_packs_r): Not here. (for_each_template_parm_r): Clear *walk_subtrees. * decl2.c (min_vis_r): Look through typedefs.
26 lines
665 B
C
26 lines
665 B
C
// PR c++/92583
|
|
// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
|
|
|
|
template <int> struct a {
|
|
constexpr operator int() { return 42; }
|
|
};
|
|
template <typename> using b = int;
|
|
template <typename d, d> struct e {};
|
|
template <typename d, d g> using h = e<d, __integer_pack(g)...>;
|
|
template <typename j, typename k, k... index> void apply(j f, e<k, index...>) {
|
|
(f(a<index>{}), ...);
|
|
}
|
|
template <auto l, typename j> void m(j f) {
|
|
using k = b<decltype(l)>;
|
|
using n = h<k, l>;
|
|
apply(f, n{});
|
|
}
|
|
template <int, int c> void o() {
|
|
auto p = [](auto i) {
|
|
if constexpr (a<i>{}) ;
|
|
if constexpr (typename a<i>::t{}); // { dg-error "" }
|
|
};
|
|
m<c>(p);
|
|
}
|
|
auto q() { o<0, 1>; }
|