explow: Fix ICE caused by plus_constant [PR94002]
The following testcase ICEs in cross to riscv64-linux. The problem is that we have a DImode integral constant (that doesn't fit into SImode), which is pushed into a constant pool and later access just the first half of it using a MEM. When plus_constant is called on such a MEM, if the constant has mode, we verify the mode, but if it doesn't, we don't and ICE later on when we think the CONST_INT is a valid SImode constant. 2020-03-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR rtl-optimization/94002 * explow.c (plus_constant): Punt if cst has VOIDmode and get_pool_mode is different from mode. * gcc.dg/pr94002.c: New test.
This commit is contained in:
parent
02ae0e08a9
commit
0ab503d34f
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
||||
2020-03-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
PR rtl-optimization/94002
|
||||
* explow.c (plus_constant): Punt if cst has VOIDmode and
|
||||
get_pool_mode is different from mode.
|
||||
|
||||
2020-03-03 Claudiu Zissulescu <claziss@synopsys.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/arc/arc.c (leigitimate_small_data_address_p): Check if an
|
||||
|
||||
@ -128,6 +128,9 @@ plus_constant (machine_mode mode, rtx x, poly_int64 c, bool inplace)
|
||||
cst = gen_lowpart (mode, cst);
|
||||
gcc_assert (cst);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (GET_MODE (cst) == VOIDmode
|
||||
&& get_pool_mode (XEXP (x, 0)) != mode)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (GET_MODE (cst) == VOIDmode || GET_MODE (cst) == mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
tem = plus_constant (mode, cst, c);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2020-03-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
PR rtl-optimization/94002
|
||||
* gcc.dg/pr94002.c: New test.
|
||||
|
||||
PR tree-optimization/93927
|
||||
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr93927-1.c: New test.
|
||||
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr93927-2.c: New test.
|
||||
|
||||
13
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr94002.c
Normal file
13
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr94002.c
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
/* PR rtl-optimization/94002 */
|
||||
/* { dg-do compile } */
|
||||
/* { dg-options "-O1 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-reassoc" } */
|
||||
/* { dg-additional-options "-fPIC" { target fpic } } */
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned a, b;
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
foo (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__builtin_sub_overflow (b, 44852956282LL, &a);
|
||||
a += ~b;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user