c-family: Fix various comment typos in c-warn.c

When looking into PR99420, I have noticed several comment typos.

2021-04-08  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* c-warn.c (do_warn_double_promotion): Fix comment typo,
	occured -> occurred.
	(check_alignment_of_packed_member): Fix a comment typo,
	memeber -> member.
	(warn_parm_ptrarray_mismatch): Fix comment typos, os -> of
	and onless -> unless.
	(warn_parm_array_mismatch): Fix comment typos, declaratation
	-> declaration and woud -> would.  Fix up comment indentation.
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Jelinek 2021-04-08 19:05:08 +02:00
parent 1cbba49e34
commit 0567998287

View File

@ -2394,7 +2394,7 @@ do_warn_double_promotion (tree result_type, tree type1, tree type2,
warn about it. */
if (c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings)
return;
/* If an invalid conversion has occured, don't warn. */
/* If an invalid conversion has occurred, don't warn. */
if (result_type == error_mark_node)
return;
if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (result_type) != double_type_node
@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ warn_for_multistatement_macros (location_t body_loc, location_t next_loc,
"this %qs clause", guard_tinfo_to_string (keyword));
}
/* Return struct or union type if the alignment of data memeber, FIELD,
/* Return struct or union type if the alignment of data member, FIELD,
is less than the alignment of TYPE. Otherwise, return NULL_TREE.
If RVALUE is true, only arrays evaluate to pointers. */
@ -3151,7 +3151,7 @@ vla_bound_parm_decl (tree expr)
}
/* Diagnose mismatches in VLA bounds between function parameters NEWPARMS
of pointer types on a redeclaration os a function previously declared
of pointer types on a redeclaration of a function previously declared
with CURPARMS at ORIGLOC. */
static void
@ -3220,7 +3220,7 @@ warn_parm_ptrarray_mismatch (location_t origloc, tree curparms, tree newparms)
if (origloc == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
origloc = newloc;
/* Issue -Warray-parameter onless one or more mismatches involves
/* Issue -Warray-parameter unless one or more mismatches involves
a VLA bound; then issue -Wvla-parameter. */
int opt = OPT_Warray_parameter_;
/* Traverse the two array types looking for variable bounds and
@ -3335,7 +3335,7 @@ expr_to_str (pretty_printer &pp, tree expr, const char *dflt)
/* Detect and diagnose a mismatch between an attribute access specification
on the original declaration of FNDECL and that on the parameters NEWPARMS
from its refeclaration. ORIGLOC is the location of the first declaration
from its redeclaration. ORIGLOC is the location of the first declaration
(FNDECL's is set to the location of the redeclaration). */
void
@ -3343,7 +3343,7 @@ warn_parm_array_mismatch (location_t origloc, tree fndecl, tree newparms)
{
/* The original parameter list (copied from the original declaration
into the current [re]declaration, FNDECL)). The two are equal if
and only if FNDECL is the first declaratation. */
and only if FNDECL is the first declaration. */
tree curparms = DECL_ARGUMENTS (fndecl);
if (!curparms || !newparms || curparms == newparms)
return;
@ -3375,7 +3375,7 @@ warn_parm_array_mismatch (location_t origloc, tree fndecl, tree newparms)
return;
}
/* ...otherwise, if at least one spec isn't empty there may be mismatches,
such as between f(T*) and f(T[1]), where the former mapping woud be
such as between f(T*) and f(T[1]), where the former mapping would be
empty. */
/* Create an empty access specification and use it for pointers with