Tweak wording in comment in last change

This commit is contained in:
Hans-Peter Nilsson 2002-02-15 06:54:22 +00:00
parent 83c2d653c3
commit 6266d8d454

View File

@ -62,15 +62,16 @@ mmix_after_allocation ()
bfd_signed_vma regvma; bfd_signed_vma regvma;
/* If there's no register section, we don't need to do anything. On the /* If there's no register section, we don't need to do anything. On the
other hand, if a non-standard linker-script without a mapping from other hand, if there's a non-standard linker-script without a mapping
MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME is present, as in the ld from MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME when that section is
test "NOCROSSREFS 2", that section (1) will be orphaned; not inserted present (as in the ld test "NOCROSSREFS 2"), that section (1) will be
in MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME and (2) we will not do the orphaned; not inserted in MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME and (2) we
necessary preparations for those relocations that caused it to be will not do the necessary preparations for those relocations that
created. We'll SEGV from the latter error. The former error in caused it to be created. We'll SEGV from the latter error. The
separation will result in a non-working binary, but that's expected former error in separation will result in a non-working binary, but
when you play tricks with linker scripts. The "NOCROSSREFS 2" test that's expected when you play tricks with linker scripts. The
does not run the output so it does not matter there. */ "NOCROSSREFS 2" test does not run the output so it does not matter
there. */
if (sec == NULL) if (sec == NULL)
sec sec
= bfd_get_section_by_name (output_bfd, = bfd_get_section_by_name (output_bfd,