Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
497f322d4d
commit
074d08b041
@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
||||
2002-12-12 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,
|
||||
|
||||
Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/tc-mn10300.h (TC_VALIDATE_FIX_SUB): Define.
|
||||
(TC_LINKRELAX_FIXUP): Add comments.
|
||||
|
||||
2002-12-12 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/tc-mn10300.c (set_arch_mach): Change argument type to
|
||||
|
@ -47,7 +47,24 @@ extern int mn10300_force_relocation PARAMS ((struct fix *));
|
||||
(! SEG_NORMAL (SEG) \
|
||||
|| ((SEG)->flags & SEC_CODE) != 0)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fixup debug sections since we will never relax them. */
|
||||
/* We validate subtract arguments within tc_gen_reloc(), so don't
|
||||
report errors at this point. */
|
||||
#define TC_VALIDATE_FIX_SUB(FIX) 1
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fixup debug sections since we will never relax them. Ideally, we
|
||||
could do away with this and instead check every single fixup with
|
||||
TC_FORCE_RELOCATION and TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_NAME, verifying
|
||||
that the sections of the referenced symbols (and not the sections
|
||||
in which the fixup appears) may be subject to relaxation. We'd
|
||||
still have to check the section in which the fixup appears, because
|
||||
we want to do some simplifications in debugging info that might
|
||||
break in real code.
|
||||
|
||||
Using the infrastructure in write.c to simplify subtraction fixups
|
||||
would enable us to remove a lot of code from tc_gen_reloc(), but
|
||||
this is simpler, faster, and produces almost the same effect.
|
||||
Also, in the macros above, we can't check whether the fixup is in a
|
||||
debugging section or not, so we have to use this for now. */
|
||||
#define TC_LINKRELAX_FIXUP(seg) (seg->flags & SEC_ALLOC)
|
||||
|
||||
#define md_operand(x)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user